Nyt fra tidsskrifterne
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
Klik på knappen for at kopiere eller tryk på linket nedenfor.
Kopieret til udklipsholder!
47 ud af 47 tidsskrifter valgt, søgeord (sepsis, septic, sofa, qsofa) valgt, emner højest 30 dage gamle, sorteret efter nyeste først.
23 emner vises.
Ha-Yeun Chung, Jonathan Wickel, Nina Hahn, Nils Mein, Meike Schwarzbrunn, Philipp Koch, Mihai Ceanga, Holger Haselmann, Carolin Baade-Büttner, Nikolai von Stackelberg, Nina Hempel, Lars Schmidl, Marco Groth, Nico Andreas, Juliane Götze, Sina M. Coldewey, Michael Bauer, Christian Mawrin, Justina Dargvainiene, Frank Leypoldt, Stephan Steinke, Zhao-Qi Wang, Michael Hust, Christian Geis
Science Advances, 27.05.2023
Tilføjet 27.05.2023
BMC Infectious Diseases, 26.05.2023
Tilføjet 26.05.2023
Abstract Background Little evidence exists regarding the prevalence of pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs), the mortality risk, and the benefit of combination therapy over monotherapy. This study aims to describe patterns of empiric antimicrobial therapy, and the epidemiology of Gram-negative pathogens, and to investigate the effect of appropriate therapy and appropriate combination therapy on the mortality of patients with BSIs. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients with BSIs of Gram-negative pathogens from January 2017 to December 2022 in a Chinese general hospital. The in-hospital mortality was compared between appropriate and inappropriate therapy, and between monotherapy and combination therapy for patients receiving appropriate therapy. We used Cox regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Results We included 205 patients in the study, of whom 147 (71.71%) patients received appropriate therapy compared with 58 (28.29%) who received inappropriate therapy. The most common Gram-negative pathogen was Escherichia coli (37.56%). 131 (63.90%) patients received monotherapy and 74 (36.10%) patients received combination therapy. The in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients administered appropriate therapy than inappropriate therapy (16.33% vs. 48.28%, p = 0.004); adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.55 [95% CI 0.35–0.84], p = 0.006). In-hospital mortality was also not different in combination therapy and monotherapy in the multivariate Cox regression analyses (adjusted HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.15–1.17], p = 0.096). However, combination therapy was associated with lower mortality than monotherapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock (adjusted HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.86–1.02], p = 0.047). Conclusions Appropriate therapy was associated with a protective effect on mortality among patients with BSIs due to Gram-negative pathogens. Combination therapy was associated with improved survival in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Clinicians need to choose optical empirical antimicrobials to improve survival outcomes in patients with BSIs.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedInfection, 24.05.2023
Tilføjet 24.05.2023
Abstract Purpose Hypermucoviscous strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) are associated with invasive liver abscess syndrome. However, little is known about the characteristics of this phenotype in non-hepatobiliary infections. In this study, we investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with hypermucoviscous Kp (hmvKp) bacteremia from non-hepatobiliary tract infection. Methods This retrospective cohort study was implemented at Samsung Changwon Hospital. From March 2018 to December 2019, adult patients (≥ 18 years) with KP bacteremia of the extra-hepatobiliary system were enrolled. Hypermucoviscosity was defined by the string test. Clinical characteristics and 30-day all-cause mortality between patients with hmvKp and non-hmvKp bacteremia were compared. Results Among 179 cases of non-hepatobiliary KP bacteremia, 67 (37.4%) and 112 (62.6%) isolates were classified as hmvKp and non-hmvKp, respectively. In the hmvKp group, metastatic infection (9.0 vs. 1.8%, P = 0.054) and purulent or necrotizing infection (31.3 vs. 9.8%, P
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedBharwani, A., Perez, M. L., Englesakis, M., Meyhoff, T. S., Perner, A., Sivapalan, P., Wilcox, M. E.
BMJ Open, 24.05.2023
Tilføjet 24.05.2023
IntroductionIntravenous crystalloid fluid resuscitation forms a crucial part of the early intervention bundle for sepsis and septic shock, with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommending a 30 mL/kg fluid bolus within the first hour. Compliance with this suggested target varies in patients with comorbidities such as congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease and cirrhosis due to concerns regarding iatrogenic fluid overload. However, it remains unclear whether resuscitation with higher fluid volumes puts them at greater risk of adverse outcomes. Thus, this systematic review will synthesise evidence from existing studies to assess the effects of a conservative as compared with a liberal approach to fluid resuscitation in patients at greater perceived risk of fluid overload due to comorbid conditions. Methods and analysisThis protocol was registered on PROSPERO and has been drafted following the checklist of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will search MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, Embase Classic, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Complete and ClinicalTrials.gov. A preliminary search of these databases was performed from their inception to 30 August 2022. The risk of bias and random errors will be assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case–control and cohort studies. If a sufficient number of comparable studies are identified, we will perform a meta-analysis applying random effects model. We will investigate heterogeneity using a combination of visual inspection of the funnel plot as well as the Egger’s test. Ethics and disseminationNo ethics approval is required for this study since no original data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022348181.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedInfection, 23.05.2023
Tilføjet 23.05.2023
Christina Yek, Alexander Lawandi, Scott R. Evans, Sameer S. Kadri
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 23.05.2023
Tilføjet 23.05.2023
Given the potential benefits of shortened antibiotic courses, prior studies comparing shorter versus longer antibiotic courses have typically adopted a non-inferiority design [3,11]. However, in a study of critically ill patients in whom suboptimal treatment could result in death, a non-inferiority trial would pose a serious ethical dilemma – how to select an “acceptable” increased risk of mortality to use as a non-inferiority margin? For these reasons, we have designed a trial that requires shorter antibiotic therapy demonstrate superior clinical outcomes over longer antibiotic therapy, allowing partial/full credit to be awarded based on patient and clinicians’ perceptions of outcome importance and severity. Should clinical outcomes be comparable among the study arms, the DOOR/RADAR framework acknowledges potential unmeasured benefits of shorter courses (e.g., reduced costs, unmeasured toxicity, and antibiotic pressures selecting for individual and global microbial resistance) and accordingly assigns superiority to shorter antibiotic courses. The duration of antibiotic therapy reflected in this adjustment would be the actual (rather than assigned) duration, allowing for a pragmatic analysis of the interventions as applied in practice while mitigating differences between intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses resulting from poor protocol adherence.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedBMC Infectious Diseases, 23.05.2023
Tilføjet 23.05.2023
Abstract Background Little evidence exists regarding the prevalence of pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs), the mortality risk, and the benefit of combination therapy over monotherapy. This study aims to describe patterns of empiric antimicrobial therapy, and the epidemiology of Gram-negative pathogens, and to investigate the effect of appropriate therapy and appropriate combination therapy on the mortality of patients with BSIs. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients with BSIs of Gram-negative pathogens from January 2017 to December 2022 in a Chinese general hospital. The in-hospital mortality was compared between appropriate and inappropriate therapy, and between monotherapy and combination therapy for patients receiving appropriate therapy. We used Cox regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Results We included 205 patients in the study, of whom 147 (71.71%) patients received appropriate therapy compared with 58 (28.29%) who received inappropriate therapy. The most common Gram-negative pathogen was Escherichia coli (37.56%). 131 (63.90%) patients received monotherapy and 74 (36.10%) patients received combination therapy. The in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients administered appropriate therapy than inappropriate therapy (16.33% vs. 48.28%, p = 0.004); adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.55 [95% CI 0.35–0.84], p = 0.006). In-hospital mortality was also not different in combination therapy and monotherapy in the multivariate Cox regression analyses (adjusted HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.15–1.17], p = 0.096). However, combination therapy was associated with lower mortality than monotherapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock (adjusted HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.86–1.02], p = 0.047). Conclusions Appropriate therapy was associated with a protective effect on mortality among patients with BSIs due to Gram-negative pathogens. Combination therapy was associated with improved survival in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Clinicians need to choose optical empirical antimicrobials to improve survival outcomes in patients with BSIs.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedBMC Infectious Diseases, 17.05.2023
Tilføjet 17.05.2023
Abstract Campylobacter spp. is a gram-negative bacillus that causes infectious enteritis and consists of several species, including Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter fetus. Although C. jejuni and C. coli cause infectious enteritis primarily in immunocompetent hosts, C. fetus causes extraintestinal infections such as septicemia, meningitis, and perinatal infections in immunocompromised hosts, as well as myopericarditis in rare cases. Only a few cases of infectious myo(peri)carditis associated with C. coli in immunocompetent hosts have been reported. These studies concentrated on antecedent C. coli enterocolitis and never demonstrated a positive culture in the pericardial fluid. A 72-year-old Japanese man presented with a 2-week fever, cough, and vomiting lasting. He was on hemodialysis for polycystic kidney disease, as well as medication for diabetes and hypertension. A chest computed tomography (CT) scan and a transthoracic echocardiogram revealed bilateral pleural fluid and large pericardial fluid at the time of admission. C. coli was identified from blood culture samples and blood-tinged pericardial fluid. He was successfully treated with antibacterial chemotherapy as well as pericardial fluid drainage and was discharged from the hospital with no complications. In this case, the presence of C. coli in the pericardial fluid confirmed the diagnosis of C. coli pericarditis. C. coli may cause septic pericarditis in immunocompromised hosts, despite typically causing only enteritis.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedDale, Christopher R.; Schoepflin Sanders, Shelley; Chang, Shu Ching; Pandhair, Omar; Diggs, Naomi G.; Woodruff, Whitney; Selander, David N.; Mark, Nicholas M.; Nurse, Sarah; Sullivan, Mark; Mezaraups, Liga; O’Mahony, D. Shane
Critical Care Explorations, 16.05.2023
Tilføjet 16.05.2023
IMPORTANCE: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends standard operating procedures for patients with sepsis. Real-world evidence about sepsis order set implementation is limited. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect of sepsis order set usage on hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four acute care hospitals in the United States from December 1, 2020 to November 30, 2022 involving 104,662 patients hospitalized for sepsis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital mortality. RESULTS: The sepsis order set was used in 58,091 (55.5%) patients with sepsis. Initial mean sequential organ failure assessment score was 0.3 lower in patients for whom the order set was used than in those for whom it was not used (2.9 sd [2.8] vs 3.2 [3.1], p < 0.01). In bivariate analysis, hospital mortality was 6.3% lower in patients for whom the sepsis order set was used (9.7% vs 16.0%, p < 0.01), median time from emergency department triage to antibiotics was 54 minutes less (125 interquartile range [IQR, 68–221] vs 179 [98–379], p < 0.01), and median total time hypotensive was 2.1 hours less (5.5 IQR [2.0–15.0] vs 7.6 [2.5–21.8], p < 0.01) and septic shock was 3.2% less common (22.0% vs 25.4%, p < 0.01). Order set use was associated with 1.1 fewer median days of hospitalization (4.9 [2.8–9.0] vs 6.0 [3.2–12.1], p < 0.01), and 6.6% more patients discharged to home (61.4% vs 54.8%, p < 0.01). In the multivariable model, sepsis order set use was independently associated with lower hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66–0.73). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a cohort of patients hospitalized with sepsis, order set use was independently associated with lower hospital mortality. Order sets can impact large-scale quality improvement efforts.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedElizabeth S. Munroe, Robert C. Hyzy, Matthew W. Semler, Manu Shankar-Hari, Paul J. Young, Fernando G. Zampieri, Hallie C. Prescott
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , 15.05.2023
Tilføjet 15.05.2023
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Volume 207, Issue 10, Page 1283-1299, May 15, 2023.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedInfection, 13.05.2023
Tilføjet 13.05.2023
Villarim, P. V. O., Marinho, V. R. D., Abreu, C. A., Moura, A. C. M. A., Silva, T. C. L., Alves, H. P. M., Rego, A. C. M., Medeiros, K. S., Araujo-Filho, I.
BMJ Open, 12.05.2023
Tilføjet 12.05.2023
IntroductionUp to the present time, the laparoscopic approach for colon cancer is considered the gold standard. However, robotic surgery has been appraised in modern medicine. It is essential to evaluate the differences between laparoscopic and robotic surgery, owing to the significant impact they cause in postoperative morbidity and mortality. This article aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to compare robotic versus laparoscopic colectomies in patients with colon cancer in terms of the incidence of colonic fistulas. Methods and analysisPubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, LILACS and Clinical trials databases will be searched for randomised clinical trials investigating the incidence of colonic fistulas in patients with colonic cancer, submitted to robotic surgery compared with a laparoscopic approach. No language or publication period restrictions will be imposed. The primary outcome will be the incidence of colonic fistulas in patients with colon cancer in different surgical approaches. The secondary outcomes will be the incidence of infection, sepsis, mortality, length of hospitalisation and malnutrition. Three independent reviewers will select the studies and extract data from the original publications. The risk of bias will be assessed using The Risk of Bias 2 tool, and the evidence’s certainty will be made using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Data synthesis will be performed using the Review Manager software (RevMan V.5.2.3). To assess heterogeneity. We will compute the I2 statistics. In addition, a quantitative synthesis will be performed if the included studies are sufficiently homogeneous. Ethics and disseminationThis study will review the published data; thus, it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021295313.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedBMC Infectious Diseases, 11.05.2023
Tilføjet 11.05.2023
Abstract Campylobacter spp. is a gram-negative bacillus that causes infectious enteritis and consists of several species, including Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter fetus. Although C. jejuni and C. coli cause infectious enteritis primarily in immunocompetent hosts, C. fetus causes extraintestinal infections such as septicemia, meningitis, and perinatal infections in immunocompromised hosts, as well as myopericarditis in rare cases. Only a few cases of infectious myo(peri)carditis associated with C. coli in immunocompetent hosts have been reported. These studies concentrated on antecedent C. coli enterocolitis and never demonstrated a positive culture in the pericardial fluid. A 72-year-old Japanese man presented with a 2-week fever, cough, and vomiting lasting. He was on hemodialysis for polycystic kidney disease, as well as medication for diabetes and hypertension. A chest computed tomography (CT) scan and a transthoracic echocardiogram revealed bilateral pleural fluid and large pericardial fluid at the time of admission. C. coli was identified from blood culture samples and blood-tinged pericardial fluid. He was successfully treated with antibacterial chemotherapy as well as pericardial fluid drainage and was discharged from the hospital with no complications. In this case, the presence of C. coli in the pericardial fluid confirmed the diagnosis of C. coli pericarditis. C. coli may cause septic pericarditis in immunocompromised hosts, despite typically causing only enteritis.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedShibata, Junichiro; Osawa, Itsuki; Fukuchi, Kiyoyasu; Goto, Tadahiro
Critical Care Explorations, 10.05.2023
Tilføjet 10.05.2023
OBJECTIVES: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021 recommends that adult patients with sepsis requiring intensive care should be admitted to the ICU within 6 hours of their emergency department (ED) visits. However, there is limited evidence on whether 6 hours is the best target time for compliance with the sepsis bundle. We aimed to investigate the association between time from ED visits to ICU admission (i.e., ED length of stay [ED-LOS]) and mortality and identify the optimal ED-LOS for patients with sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Emergency Department and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV databases. PATIENTS: Adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) who were transferred from the ED to the ICU and subsequently diagnosed with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria within 24 hours of ICU admission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 1,849 patients with sepsis, we found a disproportionally higher mortality rate in patients immediately admitted to the ICU (e.g., < 2 hr). When using ED-LOS as a continuous variable, ED-LOS was not significantly associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] per hour increase, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96–1.13; p = 0.3) after an adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., demographics, triage vital signs, and laboratory results) in the multivariable analysis. However, when we categorized all patients into time quartiles (ED-LOS: < 3.3 hr, 3.3–4.5 hr, 4.6–6.1 hr, and > 6.1 hr), patients in the higher time quartiles (e.g., 3.3–4.5 hr) had higher 28-day mortality compared with those in the lowest time quartile (< 3.3 hr) (e.g., adjusted OR for patients in the second time quartile [3.3–4.5 hr] 1.59; 95% CI, 1.03–2.46; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Earlier admission to the ICU (e.g., within 3.3 hr of ED visits) was associated with lower 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Our findings suggest patients with sepsis who require intensive care may benefit from a more immediate ICU admission than 6 hours.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedOhbe, Hiroyuki; Sasabuchi, Yusuke; Doi, Kent; Matsui, Hiroki; Yasunaga, Hideo
Critical Care Medicine, 9.05.2023
Tilføjet 9.05.2023
Objectives: To assess the association between levels of intensive care and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for sepsis, stratified by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at admission. Design: A nationwide, propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study. Setting: A Japanese national inpatient database with data on 70–75% of all ICU and high-dependency care unit (HDU) beds in Japan. Patients: Adult patients hospitalized for sepsis with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 2 on their day of admission between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021, were recruited. Propensity score matching was performed to compare in-hospital mortality, and patients were stratified into 10 groups according eto SOFA scores. Interventions: Two exposure and control groups according to treatment unit on day of admission: 1) ICU + HDU versus general ward and 2) ICU versus HDU. Measurements and Main Results: Of 97,070 patients, 19,770 (20.4%), 23,066 (23.8%), and 54,234 (55.9%) were treated in ICU, HDU, and general ward, respectively. After propensity score matching, the ICU + HDU group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality than the general ward group, among cohorts with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 6. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality among cohorts with SOFA scores 3–5. The ICU + HDU group had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than the general ward among cohorts with SOFA scores of 2. The ICU group had lower in-hospital mortality than the HDU group among cohorts with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 12. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality among cohorts with SOFA scores 5–11. The ICU group had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than the general ward group among cohorts with SOFA scores less than or equal to 4. Conclusions: Patients hospitalized for sepsis with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 6 in the ICU or HDU had lower in-hospital mortality than those in the general ward, as did those with SOFA scores greater than or equal to 12 in the ICU versus HDU.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedWardi, Gabriel; Owens, Robert; Josef, Christopher; Malhotra, Atul; Longhurst, Christopher; Nemati, Shamim
Critical Care Medicine, 9.05.2023
Tilføjet 9.05.2023
BMC Infectious Diseases, 6.05.2023
Tilføjet 6.05.2023
Abstract Background The early diagnosis of sepsis is hampered by the lack of reliable laboratory measures. There is growing evidence that presepsin and Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) are promising biomarkers in the diagnosis of sepsis. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of MR-proADM and presepsin in sepsis patients. Methods We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, China national knowledge infrastructure, and Wanfang up to 22th July, 2022, for studies evaluating the diagnosis performance of presepsin and MR-proADM in adult sepsis patients. Risk of bias was assessed using quadas-2. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to find source of heterogeneity. Results A total of 40 studies were eventually selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis, including 33 for presepsin and seven for MR-proADM. Presepsin had a sensitivity of 0.86 (0.82–0.90), a specificity of 0.79 (0.71–0.85), and an AUC of 0.90 (0.87–0.92). The sensitivity of MR-proADM was 0.84 (0.78–0.88), specificity was 0.86 (0.79–0.91), and AUC was 0.91 (0.88–0.93). The profile of control group, population, and standard reference may be potential sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrated that presepsin and MR-proADM exhibited high accuracy (AUC ≥ 0.90) in the diagnosis of sepsis in adults, with MR-proADM showing significantly higher accuracy than presepsin.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedClinical Infectious Diseases, 5.05.2023
Tilføjet 5.05.2023
AbstractBackgroundThe northwestern border of Thailand is an area of low seasonal malaria transmission. Until recent successful malaria elimination activities, malaria was a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Historically the incidences of symptomatic Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria were approximately similar.MethodsAll malaria cases managed in the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit along the Thailand-Myanmar border between 2000 and 2016 were reviewed.ResultsThere were 80,841 consultations for symptomatic P. vivax and 94,467 for symptomatic P. falciparum malaria. Overall 4,844 (5.1%) patients with P. falciparum malaria were admitted to field hospitals, of whom 66 died, compared with 278 (0.34%) with P. vivax malaria, of whom four died (three were diagnosed with sepsis, so the contribution of malaria to their fatal outcomes is uncertain). Applying the 2015 “World Health Organization severe malaria criteria”, 68/80,841 (0.08%) of P. vivax and 1,482/94,467 (1.6%) of P. falciparum admissions were classified as severe. Overall, patients with P. falciparum malaria were 15 (95% CI 13.2-16.8) times more likely than P. vivax to require hospital admission, 19 (95% CI 14.6-23.8) times more likely to develop severe malaria, and at least 14 (95% CI 5.1-38.7) times more likely to die.ConclusionsIn this area both P. falciparum and P. vivax infections were important causes of hospitalization, but life-threatening P. vivax illness was rare.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedBMC Infectious Diseases, 5.05.2023
Tilføjet 5.05.2023
Abstract Objective This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning algorithm-based model for predicting invasive Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess syndrome(IKPLAS) in diabetes mellitus and compare the performance of different models. Methods The clinical signs and data on the admission of 213 diabetic patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscesses were collected as variables. The optimal feature variables were screened out, and then Artificial Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, and XGBoost models were established. Finally, the model\'s prediction performance was evaluated by the ROC curve, sensitivity (recall), specificity, accuracy, precision, F1-score, Average Precision, calibration curve, and DCA curve. Results Four features of hemoglobin, platelet, D-dimer, and SOFA score were screened by the recursive elimination method, and seven prediction models were established based on these variables. The AUC (0.969), F1-Score(0.737), Sensitivity(0.875) and AP(0.890) of the SVM model were the highest among the seven models. The KNN model showed the highest specificity (1.000). Except that the XGB and DT models over-estimates the occurrence of IKPLAS risk, the other models\' calibration curves are a good fit with the actual observed results. Decision Curve Analysis showed that when the risk threshold was between 0.4 and 0.8, the net rate of intervention of the SVM model was significantly higher than that of other models. In the feature importance ranking, the SOFA score impacted the model significantly. Conclusion An effective prediction model of invasion Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess syndrome in diabetes mellitus could be established by a machine learning algorithm, which had potential application value.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedThaer S. A. Abdalla, Rainer Grotelüschen, Ahmed S. A. Abdalla, Nathaniel Melling, Jakob R. Izbicki, Kai Bachmann
PLoS One Infectious Diseases, 3.05.2023
Tilføjet 3.05.2023
by Thaer S. A. Abdalla, Rainer Grotelüschen, Ahmed S. A. Abdalla, Nathaniel Melling, Jakob R. Izbicki, Kai Bachmann Background Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but lethal soft-tissue infection. There is still a paucity of information regarding the diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies for the treatment of this devastating disease. This study aims to identify important perioperative parameters related to necrotizing fasciitis and to assess their relevance in terms of identifying NF. Methods and material We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent surgical exploration for suspected necrotizing fasciitis at a tertiary referral center, to explore the clinical features and factors related to the presence of necrotizing fasciitis and mortality. Results Between 2010 and 2017, 88 patients underwent surgical exploration for suspected NF. The infection occurred in the lower extremities in 48 patients, in the thoracocervical region in 18 patients, and the perineum and abdomen in 22 patients. Histological evidence of NF was present in 59 of 88 patients. NF was associated with a longer hospital stay and ICU stay (p = 0.05 and 0.019 respectively) compared to patients without NF. ROC analysis showed that only macroscopic fascial appearance could discriminate patients with histological evidence of NF. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression revealed, that liver failure (p = 0.019), sepsis (p = 0.011), positive Gram stain (p = 0.032), and macroscopic fascial appearance (p
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedBMC Infectious Diseases, 3.05.2023
Tilføjet 3.05.2023
Abstract Background Septic thrombophlebitis (STP) of the lower extremities caused by foreign bodies is rare in the clinic, and the symptoms are serious. If the correct treatment is not implemented as soon as possible, the patient may progress to sepsis. Case presentation We report the case of a 51-year-old normally healthy male who developed fever 3 days after field work. When he was weeding with a lawn mower in the field, a metal foreign body from the grass flew into his left lower abdomen, resulting in an eschar on his left lower abdomen. He was diagnosed with scrub typhus but did not respond well to anti-infective treatment. After a detailed inquiry of his medical history and an auxiliary examination, the diagnosis was confirmed as STP of the left lower limb caused by a foreign body. After surgery, anticoagulation and anti-infection treatment, the infection and thrombosis were controlled, and the patient was cured and discharged. Conclusions STP caused by foreign bodies is rare. Early detection of the aetiology of sepsis and early adoption of the correct measures can effectively block the progression of the disease and reduce the patient’s pain. Clinicians should identify the source of sepsis through a medical history and clinical examination.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedMenen Tsegaw, Bezawit Mulat, Kegnie Shitu
PLoS One Infectious Diseases, 2.05.2023
Tilføjet 2.05.2023
by Menen Tsegaw, Bezawit Mulat, Kegnie Shitu Background Appropriate disposal of child stool is vital in preventing the spread of faecal-oral diseases. According to WHO/ UNICEF Joint Monitoring Program, Safe child stool disposal includes disposing a stool in a Flush or pour-flush toilet/latrine (to a piped sewer system, septic tank, pit latrine), Ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrine or a Pit latrine with slab. Objective The study aimed to assess safe child stool disposal practice and associated factors among mothers with children aged under-two years in Gambia. Methods This study was based on a large community-based cross-sectional survey, conducted from 21 November 2019 to 30 March 2020 in Gambia. The survey employed a two-staged stratified cluster sampling technique to recruit study participants. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to summarize descriptive data and identify factors associated with safe waste disposal, respectively. A p-value of less than 0.05 and 95% confidence interval were used to determine statistical significance. Results The prevalence of safe stool disposal among mothers with children aged under-two years were 56.3% (95% CI: 54.6%, 58.1%). Mothers aged 25–34 (AOR = 0.78 (95%CI: 0.62, 0.98)), the highest wealth quintile (AOR = 0.43 (95%CI: 0.33, 0.56)), being exposed to media (AOR = 1.37 (95%CI: 1.07, 1.76)), increasing age of children (AOR = 1.06 (1.05, 1.07)), Being employed (AOR = 1.31 (1.11, 1.55)) and Geographic region were significantly associated with safe child disposal practice. Conclusion The prevalence of safe child stool disposal was low in Gambia. Age of the mother, age of the child, region, wealth index, media exposure and occupational status of the mother were significantly associated with safe child stool disposal. Public health intervention strategies designed to promote safe child stools disposal need to conduct thorough community assessments to identify community-specific facilitators, needs and barriers. Additionally, public health experts and policy makers should take into consideration the geographical and wealth inequalities when designing programs aimed to improve safe child stool disposal practice.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMedWetterslev, Mik; Hylander Møller, Morten; Granholm, Anders; Hassager, Christian; Haase, Nicolai; Lange, Theis; Myatra, Sheila N.; Hästbacka, Johanna; Arabi, Yaseen M.; Shen, Jiawei; Cronhjort, Maria; Lindqvist, Elin; Aneman, Anders; Young, Paul J.; Szczeklik, Wojciech; Siegemund, Martin; Koster, Thijs; Aslam, Tayyba Naz; Bestle, Morten H.; Girkov, Mia S.; Kalvit, Kushal; Mohanty, Rakesh; Mascarenhas, Joanne; Pattnaik, Manoranjan; Vergis, Sara; Haranath, Sai Praveen; Shah, Mehul; Joshi, Ziyokov; Wilkman, Erika; Reinikainen, Matti; Lehto, Pasi; Jalkanen, Ville; Pulkkinen, Anni; An, Youzhong; Wang, Guoxing; Huang, Lei; Huang, Bin; Liu, Wei; Gao, Hengbo; Dou, Lin; Li, Shuangling; Yang, Wanchun; Tegnell, Emily; Knight, Agnes; Czuczwar, Miroslaw; Czarnik, Tomasz; Perner, Anders; and the AFIB-ICU Collaborators
Critical Care Medicine, 1.05.2023
Tilføjet 1.05.2023
Objectives: To assess the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the ICU and to describe current practice in the management of AF. Design: Multicenter, prospective, inception cohort study. Setting: Forty-four ICUs in 12 countries in four geographical regions. Subjects: Adult, acutely admitted ICU patients without a history of persistent/permanent AF or recent cardiac surgery were enrolled; inception periods were from October 2020 to June 2021. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: We included 1,423 ICU patients and analyzed 1,415 (99.4%), among whom 221 patients had 539 episodes of AF. Most (59%) episodes were diagnosed with continuous electrocardiogram monitoring. The incidence of AF was 15.6% (95% CI, 13.8–17.6), of which newly developed AF was 13.3% (11.5–15.1). A history of arterial hypertension, paroxysmal AF, sepsis, or high disease severity at ICU admission was associated with AF. Used interventions to manage AF were fluid bolus 19% (95% CI 16–23), magnesium 16% (13–20), potassium 15% (12–19), amiodarone 51% (47–55), beta-1 selective blockers 34% (30–38), calcium channel blockers 4% (2–6), digoxin 16% (12–19), and direct current cardioversion in 4% (2–6). Patients with AF had more ischemic, thromboembolic (13.6% vs 7.9%), and severe bleeding events (5.9% vs 2.1%), and higher mortality (41.2% vs 25.2%) than those without AF. The adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio for 90-day mortality by AF was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.95–1.99). Conclusions: In ICU patients, AF occurred in one of six and was associated with different conditions. AF was associated with worse outcomes while not statistically significantly associated with 90-day mortality in the adjusted analyses. We observed variations in the diagnostic and management strategies for AF.
Læs mere Tjek på PubMed